Search
  • Dr. Roee Sarel

Stable Preferences or Moral Accounting?

Updated: Oct 1, 2018

If I do something bad, do I compensate by doing good afterwards?


In my recent working paper (co-authored with Eberhard Feess), we contrast two effects that have been identified in the economic literature. The traditional approach to economics assumes a stability of preferences, which implies that if a person is of the "anti-social" type, then when faced with similar dilemmas, that person will demonstrate stable anti-social behavior. As the old saying goes:

"Once a thief always a thief"

Moral accounting?

A countervailing effect, however, is "Mental accounting", a.k.a "Moral Self-Licensing": people are known to balance their moral acts, such that good deeds might be followed by bad ones (i.e. the person sees himself as "licensed" to do bad) - and vice versa. Thus, we may expect that immoral acts are followed by moral ones.

The real question: which of these effects dominates?


Instead of testing which theory is correct, we assume that both effects may be in play. The real question is then: which of these effects dominates? Our lab experiment attempts to answer this question.

Check out our working paper

At the following link.

30 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Roee Sarel - Personal Website

© 2020 by Roee Sarel 

  • Google Scholar
  • SSRN
  • Research Gate
  • LinkedIn Clean Grey
This site was designed with the
.com
website builder. Create your website today.
Start Now